An UFO Called State of Nature
On the presence of the modern state of nature before Hobbes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31207/colloquia.v9i0.135Keywords:
state of nature, second scholasticism, Leo StraussAbstract
Academic literature is unanimous in recognizing the relevance of Hobbes concept of state of nature for modern political philosophy. Many authors, especially under the influence of Leo Strauss and Quentin Skinner, have argued that this concept already existed before Hobbes; specifically, in Thomas Aquinas and the authors of the second scholasticism, strongly influenced by Aquinas. This article shows that this claim is based on an erroneous identification between the modern state of nature, the status legis naturae of Thomas Aquinas and the status naturae purae of late scholastic theology, and challenges the textual evidence advanced by them to prove the pre-existence of the concept. In doing so, it also contributes to better identify the precedents of Hobbes' state of nature and to elucidate its historical relationship with related, though different scholastic concepts it has been confused with.
References
Aquinas, T. 1892. Opera Omnia. Tomus septimus. Prima Secundae Summae Theologiae a quaestione LXXI ad quaestionem CXIV. Roma.
Aquinas, T. Scriptum super Sententiis. Available at: https://www.corpusthomisticum.org/iopera.html. accessed April 2022).
Aquinas, T. Summa contra gentiles. Available at: https://www.corpusthomisticum.org/iopera.html. accessed April 2022).
Aquinas, T. Summa Theologiae. Available at: https://www.corpusthomisticum.org/iopera.html. accessed April 2022).
Aristotle. 1932. Politics. Cambridge.
Aristotle. 1996. Physics. Oxford.
Azevedo, A. and Moreira, J.M. 2009. The Salamanca School. London - New York.
Baciero, F. 2003. El De legibus de Suarez y Locke. Revista Española de Filosofía Medieval 10: 387-393.
Beitz, C.R. 2009. The idea of human rights. Oxford.
Braun, H.E. 2007. Juan de Mariana and early modern Spanish political thought. Aldershot.
Brett, A.S. 1997. Liberty right and nature. New York - Cambridge.
Burns, J.H. and Goldie, M. 1991. The Cambridge History of Political Thought 1450-1700. New York - Cambridge.
Carlyle, R.W. and Carlyle, A.J. 1903. A history of mediæval political theory in the West. New York.
Castilla, F. 1995. El concepto de “estado de naturaleza” en la escolástica española de los Siglos XVI y XVII. Anuario de Filosofía del Derecho 12: 425–446.
Cicero. 1928. De Officiis. Cambridge.
Cicero. 2006. De republica, De legibus, Cato maior de Senectute, Laelius de Amicitia. Oxford.
Cicero. 2010. De finibus bonorum et malorum. New York.
Claeys, G. 1989. Citizens and saints. New York.
Copleston, F.C. 1953. A history of philosophy. Westminster.
de Lubac H. 1946. Surnaturel. Paris.
Denzinger, H. 2009. Enchiridion symbolorum definitionum et declarartionum de rebus fidei et morum. Freiburg.
Esposito, C. 2015. Suarez and the Baroque Matrix of Modern Thought. In: Salas, V. and Fastiggi, R. (eds) A Companion to Francisco Suarez. Leiden, pp.124–147.
Forteza, B. 1998. La influencia de Francisco Suarez sobre Thomas Hobbes. Convivium 11:40–79.
Gierke, O. 1987. Political theories of the Middle Age. Cambridge.
Gough, J.W. 1957. The social contract. Oxford.
Hamilton, J. 2013. The origins of Hobbes’s state of nature. Hobbes Studies 26:152–170.
Hesiod. 2006. Theogony and Works and Days. Cambridge.
Hesiod. 2006. Theogony, Works and days, Testimonia. Cambridge.
Hobbes, T. 1889). Leviathan. London.
Hoekstra, H. 2007. Hobbes on the Natural Condition of Mankind. In: Springborg, P. (ed) The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes’s Leviathan. Cambridge – New York, pp. 109–127.
Höpfl, H. 2004. Jesuit political thought. New York - Cambridge.
Höpfl, H. 2006. Scholasticism in Quentin Skinner’s Foundations. In: Brett, A. and Tully, J. (eds) Rethinking the Foundations of Modern Political Thought. Cambridge.
Höpfl, H. and Thompson, M.P. 1979. The history of contract as a motif in political thought. The American Historical Review 84(4):919-944.
Justinian. 1889. Cuerpo del derecho civil romano. Tomo 1º. Barcelona.
Klosko, G. 2005. State of Nature. New Dictionary of the History of Ideas: vol. 5, 2257-2259.
Klosko, G. and Rice, D. 1985. Thucydides and Hobbes’s state of nature. History of Political Thought 6(3):405–409.
Lechner, S. 2019. Hobbesian Internationalism. Cham.
Lev, A. 1989. Sovereignty and liberty. New York.
Love, C. 1652. The Naturall Mans Case stated, or an exact map of the little world man, considered in both his capacities, either in the state of nature, or grace. London.
Luscombe, D.E. 1982. The state of nature and the origin of the state. In: Kretzmann, N.; Kenny, A. and Pinborg, J. (eds) Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy. New York - Cambridge, pp.757-770.
Martinich, A. 2005. Hobbes. New York.
Montaigne, M. 2007. Les Essais. Paris.
Nootens, G. 2013. Popular Sovereignty in the West. New York.
Pagden, A. 1982. The fall of natural man. New York - Cambridge.
Pagden, A. 1995. Lords of all the world. New Haven.
Pasquino, P. 1994. Thomas Hobbes: La condition naturelle de l’humanite. Revue française de science politique 44:294–294.
Pierson, C. 2013. Just property. Oxford.
Plato. 2006. The republic. Books 1-5. Cambridge.
Rahner, K. 2006. States of Man, Theological. In: Rahner. (ed) Sacramentum Mundi Online. Consulted on 17 May 2022 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/2468-483X_smuo_COM_004200> First published online: 2016
Romeyer, B. 1949. La théorie suarézienne d’un état de nature pure. Archives de philosophie 18(1):37–63.
Sagüés, F. 1964. De Deo creante et elevante. In: Summa Sacrae theologiae. Volumen II. Patres Societatis Iesu facultatum theologicarum in Hispania professores (eds). Madrid, pp.445-1026.
Salmon, J.H.M. 1991. Catholic resistance theory. In: Burns, J.H. and Goldie, M. (eds) The Cambridge History of Political Thought 1450-1700. New York - Cambridge, pp 219–253.
Sanz Sánchez, S. 2017. The revival of the notion of pure nature in recent debates in English speaking theology. Annales theologici 31: 171–250.
Schrock, T. 1997. Anachronism All Around: Quentin Skinner on Francisco Suarez. Interpretation 25(1):91-123.
Scribano, E. 2008. Lo stato di pura natura dalla teologia alla política. Rinascimento 48:511-525.
Skinner, Q. 1978. The foundations of modern political thought. Volume two: The age of Reformation. New York - Cambridge.
Somos, M. and Peters, A. 2022. The state of nature. Leiden – Boston.
Soto, D. 1569. De iustitia et iure. Lyon.
Soto, D. 1552. De natura et gratia. Salamanca.
Soto, D. 1556. De iustitia et iure. Salamanca.
Soto, D. 1967. De la justicia y del derecho. Madrid.
Straumann, B. 2015. Roman law in the state of nature. Cambridge - New York.
Strauss, L. 1953. Natural right and history. Chicago.
Suarez, F. 1612. Tractatus de legibus ac Deo legislatore. Coimbra.
Suarez, F. 1613. Defensio Fidei catholicae et apostolicae. Coimbra.
Suarez, F. 1944. Selections from three works of Francisco Suarez SJ. Oxford.
Suarez, F. 1967. Tratado de las leyes y de Dios legislador. Madrid.
Suarez, F. 1970. Defensa de la Fe. Madrid.
Schwartz, D. 2008. Francisco Suarez on consent and political obligation. Vivarium 46(1):59-81.
Terrel, J. 2001. Les théories du pacte social. Paris.
Thornton, H. 2005. State of nature or Eden? Rochester.
Tierney, B. 1997. The idea of natural rights. Atlanta.
Tricaud, F. 1988. Hobbes’s conception of the state of nature from 1640 to 1651. In: Rogers, G.A.J. and Ryan, A. (eds) Perspectives on Thomas Hobbes. Oxford, pp 107-123.
Tuck, R. 1979. Natural rights theories. Cambridge - New York.
Tuck, R. 1999. The rights of war and peace. Oxford.
Vazquez de Menchaca, F. 1931. Controversiarum illustrium. Valladolid.
Vitoria, F. 1960. Obras de Francisco de Vitoria. Madrid.
Zagorin, P. 2005. Hobbes and the Law of Nature. Princeton.
Zorrilla, V. 2010. El estado de naturaleza en Bartolomé las casas. Cuadernos de pensamiento español 38: 1-181.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Gonzalo Letelier
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing in our Journal comply to the following terms:
1. Authors keep their work's copyrights, but they guarantee Colloquia to be the first publisher of their papers. They grant the Journal with a Creative Commons Attribution License, under which their work can be shared with the condition that it is appropriately cited.
2. Authors can establish further clauses for non-exclusive distribution, such as publication on a separate book or placing in an institutional data-base. Nevertheless, a note should be always added to explain that the paper was originally published in Colloquia.
This Journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a file distributed among participating libraries, allowing these libraries to create permanent archives of the Journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More information...
