Institutional Conditions for the Durability of Democracy

Authors

  • Erick Alvarez Barreno

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31207/colloquia.v8i0.109

Keywords:

democracy, institutions, parliamentarism, presidentialism, social capital

Abstract

This article aims to identify the institutional conditions for the sustainability of democracy. From a comprehensive literature review which spans the general conditions of its emergence and permanence, the discussion introduced by Seymour Lipset, Ronald Inglehart, Juan Linz, and Robert Putnam are covered. The conclusions indicate that formal institutions that diminish political conflict related to electoral competition are positively conducive to the sustainability of democracy. In the other hand, a social capital that emphasizes norms of reciprocity and networks of civil commitment intuitively would affect the survival of democracy.

 

References

De Aquino, T. (1990). Summa Theologiae (Parte II-II a) (Vol. III). Madrid: Biblioteca de Autores Cristianos.

De Aquino, T. (1994). Summa Theologiae (Parte II-II b) (Vol. IV). Madrid: Biblioteca de Autores Cristianos.

Dictionary.com & Oxford University Press. (s.f.). Perdonar. Obtenido de Lexico: https://www.lexico.com/es/definicion/perdonar

Kendrick, S., Kendrick, A., & Kimbrough, L. (2019). Definidos: La identidad que Dios te dio (2da ed.). B&H Publishing Group.

Martínez Priego, C. (2018). ¿Es posible la educación de la afectividad? En M. Pérez de Laborda, C. Vanney, & F. J. Soler Gil, ¿Quiénes somos? Cuestiones en torno al ser humano (págs. 147-151). Pamplona: EUNSA.

Martínez-Priego, C., & Romero-Iribas, A. (2021). The emotions behind character friendship: From other?oriented emotions to the ‘bonding feeling’. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 1-21. doi:10.1111/jtsb.12277

Polo, L. (2015). Introducción a la filosofía (Vols. Serie A, vol. XII). Pamplona: EUNSA.

Polo, L. (2016). Antropología trascendental (Obras Completas, Serie A ed., Vol. XV). Pamplona: EUNSA.

Polo, L. (2016). Lecciones de Ética. Ética. Hacia una versión moderna de los temas clásicos (Obras Completas, Serie A ed., Vol. XI). Pamplona: EUNSA.

Polo, L. (2016). Quién es el hombre. Presente y futuro del hombre (Obras Completas, Serie A ed., Vol. X). Pamplona: EUNSA.

Romero Iribas, A. M. (2015). El estatuto antropológico de la amistad y su dimensión social: perspectivas para el Siglo XXI. Pamplona: Tesis doctoral de la Universidad de Navarra.

Waldinger, R. J., & Schulz, M. S. (2010). What's love got to do with it? Social functioning, perceived health, and daily happiness in married octogenarians. Psychology and Aging, 25(2), 422-431. doi:10.1037/a0019087

Condiciones institucionales para la durabilidad de la democracia

Almond, Gabriel A., y Sidney Verba (1963). The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Diamond, Larry J. (1990). “Three Paradoxes of Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 1 (3), pg. 48-60.

Fukuyama, Francis (2008). “Do Defective Institutions Explain the Development Gap between the United States and Latin America?” En Fukuyama (2008). Falling Behing. Explaining the Development Gap Between Latin America and the United States. Oxford: University Press, pg. 194-221.

Inglehart, Ronald (1997). Modernization and Postmodernization. Cultural, Economic and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Inglehart, Ronald, y Christian Welzel (2003). “Political Culture and Democracy: Analyzing Cross-Level Linkages.” Comparative Politics 36 (1), pg. 61-79.

Linz, Juan J. (1990). “The Perils of Presidentialism.” Journal of Democracy 1 (1), pg. 51-69.

Lipset, Seymour M. (1959). “Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy.” The American Political Science Review 55, pg. 69-105.

Mainwaring, Scott (1993). “Presidentialism, Multipartyism, and Democracy: The Difficult Combination.” Comparative Political Studies 26, pg. 198-228.

Mainwaring, Scott, y Matthew S. Shugart (1997). “Juan Linz, Presidentialism, and Democracy: A Critical Appraisal.” Comparative Politics 29 (4), pg. 449-471.

Muller, Edward N., y Mitchell A. Seligson (1994). “Civic Culture and Democracy: The Question of Casual Relationships.” The American Political Review 88 (3), pg. 635-652.

Munk, Gerardo L. (2010). “Los orígenes y la durabilidad de la democracia en América Latina: Avances y Retos de una agenda de investigación.” Revista de Ciencia Política 30 (3), pg. 573-597.

North, Douglas C. (1991). “Institutions.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 5 (1), pg. 97-112.

Przeworski, Adam, Michael Álvarez, José Antonio Cheibub, y Fernando Limongi (1996). “What makes democracies endure?” Journal of Democracy 7 (1), pg. 89-108.

Przeworski, Adam, y Fernando Limongi (1997). “Modernization: Theories and Facts.” Cambridge University Press 49, pg. 155-183.

Putnam, Robert D. (1993). Making Democracy Work. Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Putnam, Robert D. (2003). El Declive del Capital Social. Un Estudio internacional sobre las sociedades y su sentido comunitario. Barcelona: Galaxia Gutenberg.

Published

2021-12-20